adam4adam-inceleme yorumlar

While doing so, no matter if gender variations have been questioned, i found no differences when considering women and men

While doing so, no matter if gender variations have been questioned, i found no differences when considering women and men

Whether or not the analyses discover a good fit for the study, i checked out whether or not some other design you can expect to fit the information just as better otherwise ideal (MacCallum, Wegener, Uchino, & Fabrigar, 1993). Contour dos presents it inversed causation choice model less than.

An option exploratory structural design: What if sexual bias forecasts communications and you can confident event having homosexuals, sensed resemblance having peers' thinking towards homosexuality, and you may religiosity. All the good outlines show statistically tall routes at the .05 top. Magnitudes away from connection are presented with the high quality problems in parentheses; X dos (61, Letter = 360) = . Normed (NFI), non-normed (NNFI), and you will comparative (CFI) goodness-of-complement try .91, .91, .93, respectively; RMSEA was .09.

Technically, it's just just like the possible that individuals having greater negative perceptions toward homosexuality manage stay away from reaching gay males and you can lesbians, score its relations once the negative, seeing their friends because the that have more perceptions on the homosexual anyone, or look for support regarding their beliefs inside their religiosity

The fresh approach model had a good fit, [? dos (61, N = 360) = , p 2 =11%); positive enjoy that have homosexual boys and lesbians (?=-.fifty, se = .06, p 2 =25%); identified peer similarities within their attitudes toward homosexuals (?=-.19, se = .08, p 2 =4%); and you may, religiosity (?=.forty-eight, se = .04, p 2 =23%). Extreme correlations had been discover toward disturbances regarding thought parallels having peers' attitudes toward homosexuals as well as their prior relationships which have gay people and you may lesbians (r=.18, se = .06, p 2 =.11); 25% out-of participants' positive feel that have homosexual anyone (R 2 =.25); 4% of peer parallels that have homosexual men (Roentgen 2 =.04); and you can 23% of religiosity (Roentgen 2 =.23).

While you are these types of email address details are notable, we opposed and therefore model fitting the data top using the Model AIC and Model CAIC coefficients to own low-nested model contrasting and every models' complement indices. The initial design had a much better match (Model AIC=; Design CAIC=-; NFI = .92; NNFI = .92; CFI = .94; RMSEA = .08) compared to the option design (Model AIC = & CAIC=-; NFI = .91; NNFI = .91; CFI = .93; RMSEA = .09). The difference inside match across the two patterns indicates all of our brand new model's theoretic rationale matches the knowledge finest (Byrne, 1994).


We set-up a structural design to check if relationships and confident feel which have homosexuals, imagined parallels that have peers' perceptions on the homosexuality, and you will religiosity had been predictive regarding sexual prejudice certainly one of a population out of Puerto Rican young adults. Our very own results strongly recommend most of the hidden parameters, with the exception of peers' thinking on the homosexuality, forecast participants' intimate bias with the gay group. If you're previous experts have found sexual prejudice may be higher for men than women (Kite, 1992; Herek, 2000b), we were struggling to imitate these types of overall performance.

What number of gay people known by the professionals shorter their claimed sexual prejudice towards homosexual group. So it wanting suggests that Puerto Rican youth's intimate prejudice tends to be dependent on the lack of exposure to gays and you can lesbians. The latest stigmatization from homosexual folk on Puerto Rican society could possibly get limitation specific students' exposure to gay people and you can lesbians. Contained in this society, taking within the-group boards that have gay boys and you will lesbians, such as, could possibly get helps students' relationships having gay people and you can lesbians. Other scientists have discovered these types of class room products decrease specific heterosexual's bad appraisals into homosexual boys and you can lesbians (Sakalli & Ugurlu, 2001).

Our very own results including recommend that participants' self-confident enjoy with gay men and lesbians use an impacts within intimate prejudice towards homosexual anybody. Participants' recall regarding self-confident skills with homosexual males and you can lesbians is highly predictive of its intimate prejudice. Also, the current presence of an optimistic association ranging from participants' interactions that have homosexuals and their remember out of self-confident knowledge with this particular classification ways a keen iterative processes for which Puerto Rican young people you may boost otherwise decrease its intent to activate that have homosexual anyone during the after moments. Such results suggest that Puerto Rican more youthful adults' appraisals of their experience of homosexual people are particularly important inside construction and you may utilization of factors to cut back sexual prejudice. Circumstances and you can settings promoting an atmosphere where greet and you may unlock talk was normalized will get assists confident interchanges. Lookup on which constitutes positive experience ranging from Puerto Rican heterosexual and you may gay individuals is required.

כתיבת תגובה

האימייל לא יוצג באתר. שדות החובה מסומנים *